Friday, August 29, 2008

seriously, socialism?

Its no secret that I support Barack Obama. I almost always vote democrat because I believe that being an American, everybody should have the same opportunities I did. I had a leg up on many because I had a great and supportive family growing up that afforded me a good education and support along the way - why should only a select few of us have a fighting chance at living the American dream.

(disclaimer, I will be voting for our GOP governor in Indiana this year because of a good track record and keeping his nose out of Roe v Wade, Church/State and Gay rights issues - he's just cleaning up a messy state that can blamed on both parties throughout the last 15 years).

I read a lot about Barack, McCain and the election process as a whole. Some of this is from credible sources, some not - but I feel like I've got a pretty good idea of what is true and what is not. Lately, I've been making the mistake of reading random user comments - more often than not, these people are idiots who like to use phrases like:


NeoCons
Democraps
McSame
Barack Osama
Liberal/leftist

you get the idea. However, I get so tired of seeing the word Socialism.

Seriously, socialism. Here's what the first paragraph of Wikipedia says about it:

Socialism - refers to any of various economic and political concepts of state or collective (i.e. public) ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods and services, some of which have been developed into more or less highly articulated theories and/or praxis.

OK, I'm not sure what all that means but certainly there have to be some good things about Socialism. For example, how about Police and Fire Departments? These are publicly owned entities that benefit everybody. We all pay for them and we all reap the rewards. How about public schools? Again, access to everybody and for minimal additional cost than your property/state/local taxes. I guess what I'm getting at is - why are people so quick to label Democrats as Socialists when in fact it seems like the entire country has had these types of services for centuries.

Don't get me wrong, I recognize that Socialism can certainly go far beyond what I'm talking about and in directions that even the staunchest Leftist (I couldn't resist) would shy away from. I'm just tired of seeing the Socialist label thrown by people who attended public schools, have used police/fire services, or currently collect some sort of aid (social security or medicare for example).

I want to institute a new rule. You use the world Socialism to describe the Democrats again - you forgo your rights to Social Security, Medicare/aid, Police and Fire Protection.

No comments: